Showing posts with label Pedestrian Accidents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pedestrian Accidents. Show all posts

Friday, May 16, 2014

Maryland Personal Injury Attorney | Statute of Limitations in a Personal Injury Lawsuit in Maryland

So you've been involved in an auto collision and sustained injuries but you don't have the time to schedule a doctor's appointment and handle the situation. Or maybe you have the time but you're overwhelmed because there seems to be a mountain of paperwork to read and your medical bills are getting uncomfortably high. Perhaps you've been meaning to consult an attorney but between your career and real life, you can't seem to make time. These are common situations for our clients who have been involved in auto collisions. However, it is important to understand that by delaying, you could be legally unable to file a claim and receive damages, even if you were the victim.


"Statutes of limitations" are laws that set time limits on how long you have to file a civil or criminal lawsuit. These time limits depend on the legal claim or crime involved in the case, and vary from state to state. For example, in some states you may have three years to file a personal injury lawsuit after you were hurt in car accident, but in other states you may have two years. As a general rule, the time period begins to run on the date your claim arises or "accrues," like the day of the car accident.


The statute of limitations that applies to most tort cases in Maryland is MD Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-101, which provides that "a civil action at law shall be filed within three years from the date it "accrues" unless another provision of the Code provides a different period of time within which an action shall be commenced." Deciding when a cause of action accrues is often a matter of complex legal interpretation. It is a good idea to consult a lawyer to help you figure out when your cause of action accrued. Remember, once the statute of limitations has expired or "run," you can no longer file a lawsuit.


logo main.jpg




Wednesday, August 29, 2012

The Best Maryland Injury Lawyers Know Crosswalks: Do You?


Many Marylanders know that they are supposed to walk inside of a crosswalk when crossing an intersection. However, most do not know the potential consequences of failing to do so, and the many nuances in Maryland's laws, like the effect of contributory negligence on pedestrians and crosswalks. In fact, injury attorneys in Maryland are confronted with the harsh consequences of crosswalk accident cases every day. This piece addresses some tips on how to avoid being on the wrong side of Maryland's crosswalk laws.


In Maryland, a crosswalk exists where a sidewalk ends at the street. Therefore, there are two types of crosswalks. The first is a "marked crosswalk." The second, and less commonly known, is an "unmarked crosswalk." An unmarked crosswalk is defined under Maryland Law as: "that part of a roadway that is within the [continuation] or connection of the lateral lines of sidewalks at any place where 2 or more roadways of any kind meet or join, measured from the curbs or, in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the roadway." In other words, there does not have to be a marked path or a sidewalk on both sides of the street for a crosswalk to exist. If a sidewalk approaches a street and ends, even if there is no sidewalk on the opposite side of the street, an unmarked crosswalk exists where the sidewalk would have extended into the street. Therefore, in unmarked areas as these automobile accident victims have the right-of-way.



Pedestrians should also know that they may not cross an intersection diagonally, unless there is a crossing device that not only permits a pedestrian to cross the intersection diagonally but also signals the pedestrian to do so. Furthermore, a pedestrian is required by law to walk on the right half of a crosswalk. In the case of jay-walking pedestrians, Maryland places a high duty of care on the pedestrian. This means that a pedestrian who crosses a street without using a crosswalk has the responsibility of making sure that no car hits them. This is important because many people believe that the operators of vehicles have the responsibility not to hit pedestrians. Yet, it is pedestrians who have the responsibility of not being struck by a vehicle when crossing at a location other than a crosswalk. Therefore, pedestrian accidents that occur outside of a crosswalk often lead to no personal injury recovery for such automobile accident victims.



Maryland is one of the few states that requires its personal injury attorneys to confront the rule of contributory negligence. Under Maryland Contributory Negligence law, if a person injured by another is negligent leading up to the automobile accident that caused them harm, that person is completely prevented from recovering against the party that injured them in the collision. In the case of a pedestrian hit by a motor vehicle, this means that if a pedestrian fails to follow the proper rules of the road regarding pedestrian street-crossing, a pedestrian can be out of luck when he or she looks to the Maryland courts for justice in their personal injury claim.



Because of contributory negligence laws in Maryland, even the best and most experienced Maryland personal injury lawyers can do little to help a victim recover in an automobile accident case if he or she was negligent in crossing a street. Therefore, it is important to know that when crossing a street pedestrians should make sure to walk within crosswalks and obey traffic signals. By doing this, the right-of-way is on your side when you need an experienced Maryland Injury Attorney to fight for you.

If you or a family member has been injured or killed in an automobile accident, truck, bus or motorcycle accident, pedestrian accident, and would like a free legal consultation or if you would like more information on car accidents or personal injury, please feel free to contact our office or visit us on the web at www.portnerandshureaccidentlawyers.com.

 

















Enhanced by Zemanta


Thursday, February 9, 2012

What Makes Portner & Shure Better than Other Personal Injury Attorneys in Howard County?


  1. Familiarity with Columbia and the surrounding area. We opened in Ellicott City eighteen years ago, and now have our main office in Columbia. Since that time we have settled or tried over 15,000 personal injury cases, many for Howard County clients. We know how to best handle a Howard County accident case just by shear experience. Our verdicts and settlements in Howard County reveal that we can recover fair compensation from every insurance carrier including Allstate, MAIF, and GEICO. Further, the Howard County criminal defense attorneys on staff here at Portner & Shure have been to court with thousands of criminal defendants and have obtained excellent results. I have lived in Ellicott City for over ten years and am active in the community. In addition, half of our staff resides in Columbia or Ellicott City. As a result, we know the tendencies of the citizens who make up juries in Howard County and we know the tendencies of most of the Howard County District Court and Circuit Court Judges. This knowledge is a great asset in Howard County personal injury jury and Howard County criminal cases.

  2. Does Portner & Shure do anything special to help represent the diverse make up of the residents of Howard County?Howard County has an extremely large and active Korean community. Our Korean Department allows our Howard County personal injury law firm to help Korean speaking accident victims and Korean speaking criminal defendants in Ellicott City and Columbia. In order to assist the Spanish speaking population, we currently have a Spanich department, including Elizabeth, Norma, Claudia, Will and Cynthia, to help with Spanish speaking automobile accident victims and Spanish speaking residents charged with DWI or other criminal offenses in Ellicott City and Columbia. Lastly, we have a Chinese department, consisting of Rosanna, Jane and Christine, to help Chinese speaking automobile accident victims and Chinese speaking criminal defendants in Columbia and Ellicott City.

  3. Why Portner & Shure in Howard County?


  • Our foreign departments allow our Howard County law firm to help the diverse population

  • Our Howard County attorneys are always available

  • We have a convenient, main office located in Columbia in Howard County

  • Our Howard County attorneys have experience in Howard County from working and living here for approximately eighteen years.

  • Our track record of great results

  • We are respected by every insurance company


Top Ten Defenses to Maryland Personal Injury Claims


  1. Liability - Many Maryland auto accident cases involve a dispute over who is at fault. In a simple rear end collision, liability is often accepted when the claim is filed. If the accident involves a lane change, sudden stop, multiple impacts or two different accounts of the accident with no police report or witness, the automobile insurance company often denies liability(almost always if the carrier is Geico or MAIF). These claims end up in court where an experienced personal injury attorney has the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the other driver was at fault. The term preponderance of the evidence means more likely than not. In other words, the fate of your accident recovery often depends on the experience of the trial lawyer you retained. A "Trial Lawyer" is someone you need to hire when you first call an attorney, not just a Maryland accident lawyer. Portner & Shure's attorneys are trial attorneys and our website reflects many of the injury awards we have received in court, not just by settling.

  2. Contributory Negligence - Maryland's contributory negligence doctrine is cut throat and can be a complete bar to an injured victim's recovery. Maryland personal injury attorneys often struggle to help clients because of this all or nothing rule. Under contributory negligence, the accident victim's failure to exercise a reasonable degree of care and caution, no matter how slight, is an absolute bar to recovery. If the defendant's lawyer can convince a jury that the victim was only 1% at fault, that individual will not recover any damages. Maryland personal injury lawyers have been struggling against the doctrine of contributory negligence since it was adopted by the Maryland Court of Appeals in 1847. In 1868, accident victims received some reprieve when the Court of Appeals adopted the last clear chance doctrine. The last clear chance doctrine allows recovery by an accident victim, who would other wise be barred from recovery due to contributory negligence, if the defendant had the last chance to avoid the accident. Many Maryland accident attorneys do not understand how this rule works. As a result, you must hire an experienced injury lawyer who can overcome this rule.

  3. Low Property Damage - Some automobile accident claims, where liability is not disputed, don't settle. One of the main reasons these cases fail to settle is because insurance adjusters refuse to offer fair settlements in accidents where the property damage to the injured victim's vehicle amounts to less than $1,000. Insurance companies often argue, in these cases, that the medical treatment received by the injured party was not warranted considering the low impact and that the injuries suffered could not have resulted from a minor accident. The adjusters' low impact argument often fails in court. There are several arguments that can be made on behalf of a plaintiff by an experienced Maryland accident lawyer. First, large accidents with significant property damage can result in little or no injuries to those involved, while minor accidents often result in serious injuries. Second, especially in rear end collisions, the injured victim does not have a chance to brace for impact. Third, sometimes the types of vehicles involved can explain the extent of the property damage. Forth, the evaluation of the accident victim's injuries and treatment is done by medical professionals who, absent evidence to the contrary, give medical treatment that is fair and reasonable and medically necessary. In almost every district court in Maryland, Portner & Shure trial attorneys have prevailed in low impact accidents.

  4. Preexisting Injury or Underlying Condition - In many personal injury cases, the injured victim may have a preexisting injury or underlying condition. In these personal injury cases, insurance companies' attorneys will argue that the individual was already injured, experiencing symptoms before the accident and that the injury was not caused by the accident. When a plaintiff has a preexisting injury, an experienced Maryland accident attorney can use medical records to show that the plaintiff was fully recovered from the accident and released from treatment. Further, the personal injury attorney can argue that the plaintiff was asymptomatic before the current accident or that the preexisting injury was made worse by the accident. If the injured accident victim has a preexisting injury, such as a degenerative back condition, the fact that the condition was exacerbated or that there was a predisposition for an injury could explain why the accident resulted in significant injury. This argument is based off of the "Egg Shell Theory" which dictates that the condition of the victim prior to the accident does not mitigate the liability of the negligent party for the injuries resulting from the accident. In other words, "you take the victim as you find them".

  5. (a) Causally Related - Sometimes insurance companies and there lawyers will argue that the injuries are not causally related to the accident, and that there is no reasonable connection between the accident and the alleged injuries. For example, if an individual is involved in an automobile accident and claims that, as a result, he or she had an appendix removed there is a strong argument against that claim. However, if a person is involved in an accident, which leads to a panic attack and an overnight stay in a hospital, there is a strong argument to be made that the condition was caused or exacerbated because of another person's negligence. Again, the Maryland personal injury attorneys have to prove by, a preponderance of the evidence, that the injury was caused by the accident, which means that the injury was more likely than not caused by the accident.
  6. (b) Medically Necessary - This defense is often used when an injury victim pursues alternative healthcare such as acupuncture, acupressure and aquatic therapy. Insurance companies and there attorneys argue that this treatment is not legitimate. At trial, defense attorneys will often make a pretrial objection to any type of acupuncture treatment. The Maryland attorneys at Portner & Shure represent many Chinese, Korean and Vietnamese accident victims. Our Maryland accident attorneys defeat the objections of defense attorneys. Acupuncture is an ancient form of medicine and to argue that an injury victim does not have an option to be treated by an acupuncturists is rarely successful at trial. In Maryland accident cases that involve more serious injuries, defense attorneys often argue that invasive procedures such as surgery and epidural steroid injections are not medically necessary. This argument is easily overcome by the expert testimony of a treating physician.
  7. Assumption of the Risk - The concept of "assumption of the risk" is fairly basic. For example, bee keepers assume the risk of being stung and rock climbers assume the risk of falling to their death. Simply put, a person who engages in risky activities cannot complain when the result is injury or death. The legal concept of "assumption of the risk" is based on the same principle, but does require a more detailed explanation. In Maryland, a person assumes the risk if that individual voluntarily engages a particular action or inaction known to that person to be inherently dangerous. If that particular action or inaction leads to an accident which results in injury, there can be no claim of negligence. For example, if a person is having a particularly good time and decides to dance on top of the bar, that individual cannot claim negligence if he or she slips on a spilled drink and falls. Assumption of the risk is a favorite argument of defense lawyers in Maryland, however, it is seldom applicable in auto accident, malpractice and product liability cases. The assumption of the risk defense is often utilized successfully in Maryland slip and fall cases.

  8. Subsequent Accident or Injury - If an accident victim is involved in a subsequent accident the insurance companies and their attorneys can argue that the subsequent accident superceded the prior accident. An experienced Maryland personal injury lawyer can overcome this defense by examining the medical records. If the plaintiff's complaints were resolved before the subsequent accident then the defense is without merit. In cases where the subsequent accident was minor and there was little to no treatment, the personal injury attorney can argue that the subsequent accident was merely a blip on the radar and did not impact the more serious injuries resulting from the prior accident.

  9. Gaps in Treatment - Too often Maryland accident victims wait several days before they are seen by a doctor, physical therapist or chiropractor. The longer the gap between the accident and the initial medical evaluation and treatment the stronger the argument that the accident victim did not require treatment. Defense attorneys like to argue that because an accident victim didn't immediately go to the hospital or doctor that the plaintiff's complaints lose credibility. Experienced Maryland personal injury attorneys should know that, in many cases, symptoms such as pain and stiffness do not manifest until a few days after the accident. Once an initial evaluation is done, gaps between treatment can be damaging to a personal injury claim. Most treatment plans follow a schedule prescribed by a medical professional designed to reach optimal recovery. Deviation from the treatment plan should be avoided. A defense attorney, who is presented with gaps ranging from a week to a month between treatment dates, has a very strong argument against the plaintiff's claims.

  10. Fair and Reasonable - This is a term based off of community standards. This argument is often used when an injury victim double treats with two chiropractors and neither of the chiropractors knows. Defense attorneys will argue that an injury victim over treated and that the length of treatment was too long. In some cases, an injury victim may get MRI's of parts of the body that weren't injured in the accident. Sometimes healthcare providers over charge or over treat. When this unfair practice occurs the healthcare provider actually comes under attack and those bills may be nullified by the court's determination. The basic rule to follow in order to avoid this defense is to treat until your injuries are resolved.

  11. Poor Witness - The insurance company will often contend the accident case is worthless because the plaintiff does not present well, or is a poor witness. In these instances the carrier must be pressed to give the exact reason for this contention. Often adequate trial preparation can overcome this issue. Further, the issue may be raised due to prejudice or language barriers. Some adjusters hear a foreign accent, whether Spanish, Chinese, Korean or Vietnamese, and immediately offer less. At Portner & Shure we have experience in Maryland courts litigating cases including Spanish, Korean, Chinese and Vietnamese speaking accident victims. Our Verdicts have never suffered because one of our plaintiffs is non-English speaking.


 


Howard County Automobile Accident Attorney

If you are involved in an automobile accident in Howard County, you need access to an attorney who knows the local courts and has considerable past personal injury experience. You need to be assured that when you hire your Howard County personal injury law firm, you are in competent, experienced and qualified hands. In your search for the right Howard County accident attorney, your research will have been a success if you call attorney, Jon Portner, Richard Shure, Kevin Ruby or Nick Parr at Portner & Shure.



The auto accident Team at Portner & Shure understands that the best auto accident case results aren't just earned in the courtroom. In order to succeed, a proper investigation must be conducted in the early stages of the process including a thorough case review and discovery. Our personal injury legal team has a desire to win and does not back down to the Howard County insurance defense attorneys, unlike some other personal injury law firms in Howard County. We prepare extensively for automobile accident cases and treat these cases with the utmost importance. A strong desire to win and exceptional preparation have enabled us to obtain an excellent track record in the Howard County District Court and the Howard County Circuit Court.


Our reputation in Howard County places us at or near the top among our peers in both settling and trying auto accident cases. A respectable personal injury litigation firm must excel at both. Combined Mr. Portner and Mr. Shure have negotiated and/or tried thousands of automobile accident cases throughout Maryland. Mr. Portner has considerable experience and a proven track record in Howard County District and Circuit Court.


In an attempt to be the best automobile accident attorneys in Howard County, the personal injury team at Portner & Shure constantly works to improve their knowledge in the personal injury arena and educates others. In this regard, Mr. Portner and Mr. Parr have researched and written numerous blogs concerning case values, tendencies of insurance companies, jurisdictional analysis, and litigation strategy.


The passion of that our automobile accident trial team displays in and out of the courtroom, as well as our advocacy experience and belief in our clients, has enabled us to convince judges, juries, and even insurance companies' attorneys to see the case from our prospective. Call Portner & Shure for your Howard County automobile accident representation, and experience our winning team's passion, experience and talent. Portner & Shure handles Howard County automobile accident cases throughout the county including, Columbia, Ellicott City, Clarksville, Fulton, Laurel, Glenelg, Jessup, and Sykesville.


Wednesday, October 5, 2011

What Is the Difference in Maryland Between a Survival and a Wrongful Death Action?

When an automobile accident, truck accident or doctor's negligence results in a fatality there are two separate claims that can be made on behalf of the victim's family and estate. A Maryland wrongful death attorney can bring a wrongful death action. This type of claim is brought by the immediate relatives of the victim. In a wrongful death claim the family seeks to recover for their losses resulting from the accidental death of a loved one. A Maryland personal injury lawyer can also bring what is called a survival action on behalf of the victim's estate. A survival action claims recovery for the injuries suffered by the decedent including the pain and suffering and other damages and actual expenses incurred by the victim up until the time of death.



In a wrongful death action in Maryland, the amount immediate family members can recover is determined by the emotional and financial harm they experienced as a result of their loss. In a wrongful death case the estate of the decedent is not involved and the family members of the victim are acting entirely on their own behalf. In a survival action in Maryland, the amount the decedent's estate can recover is determined by the harm to the actual victim. The representative of the estate brings the lawsuit on behalf of the decedent.


The Maryland personal injury attorneys and Maryland wrongful death lawyers at Portner & Shure are experienced in handling these types of lawsuits. Our attorneys balance professionalism, aggressiveness and compassion when we represent client's who have lost a loved one.


Thursday, June 2, 2011

Maryland Is 15th Most Deadly for Pedestrians

ped.jpgA national study released this week by the advocacy group Transportation for America ranks Maryland as the 15th most dangerous for pedestrians out of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Baltimore also earned distinction by being recognized as the 32nd most dangerous metropolitan area for walkers out of the 52 considered by the most recent version of the report 'Dangerous by Design." I was surprised, frankly, that Baltimore wasn't ranked higher considering the city's dubious high scores in murders, drug addiction, teenage pregnancy and STD's. I should know better. Baltimore never disappoints unless you are an O's fan. The report actually singles Baltimore out as an example of a city where pedestrian deaths have increased during the past decade. From 2000 to 2009, a period when total traffic deaths decreased by six percent, pedestrian deaths increased from 43 in 2000 to 62 in 2009.



Florida is actually the most dangerous state for pedestrian accidents, scoring a 182.8 on the index, while Maryland scored 76.4. Jeesh, you better look both ways before crossing the street in Florida; Orlando, Tampa, Jacksonville and Miami were the four most dangerous areas. In contrast, Vermont, the safest state, scored 11.2. In comparison to other countries, the United States is almost twice as dangerous as Australia. Experts believe the reason for the dangerous conditions are road designs which focus on maximum vehicle speed as opposed to pedestrian safety.


1,057 pedestrians died on Maryland roads from 2000 to 2009. 481 of those deaths occurred in Baltimore City. It is not surprising that in an earlier study Maryland was noted for having one of the lowest rates of spending for pedestrian safety projects in the United States. If you or someone you know has been injured or killed in a pedestrian accident contact the Maryland pedestrian injury lawyers and wrongful death attorneys at Portner & Shure.


Monday, May 9, 2011

91 -Year-Old Anne Arundel County Man Killed in Scooter Crash

Baltimore and the surrounding area seems to have no regard for crosswalks. Maybe the color needs to be changed from white to bright red. Recently the Baltimore Metropolitan Area has suffered a rash of pedestrian, bicyclists and motorcyclists accidents. Three students have been injured at or near the Johns Hopkins campus, most notably a bicyclists who probably will never regain the majority of his cognitive functions. The family of that young man has filed a $10 million lawsuit. The biker was in a bike lane. It is unclear whether the two students struck this weekend were in a crosswalk. What is clear is that the man killed in Brooklyn Park last week was within a clearly marked crosswalk.



If a pedestrian suffers injuries or is killed because they are struck by a vehicle, their recovery for resulting injuries may depend on whether they were crossing in a crosswalk, especially if a crosswalk exists at the scene of the accident. Maryland law regarding pedestrians requires that a person crossing where there is a clearly marked crosswalk must cross within that crosswalk. If the pedestrian fails to do so, their claim may be unsuccessful because of contributory negligence, which is a common defense to tort claims in Maryland.


This elderly man, who was riding a mobility scooter, crossed completely within the crosswalk. Through no fault of his own, the man was struck by a Toyota Tundra and was pronounced dead after being taken to Maryland Shock Trauma. As a result of his death, the deceased man's family may have a wrongful death lawsuit against the driver.


Thursday, April 21, 2011

Road Workers, Construction Sites and Accidents: What Are the Rules?

Road workers throughout the United States are often struck during the course of their jobs. Additionally, they often cause other cars to strike each other because the work area is not properly designated or marked. Many of these automobile accidents often lead to tragedies. However, they can be avoided if the road workers are more familiar with, and follow safety procedures. In addition to State highway workers, companies that contract for road work are given copies of the safety rules.


A contractor was killed on Eastbound Rt. 50 when he was either deploying or retrieving traffic counting equipment. The employee was wearing reflective clothing. Safety rules require a spotter to assist the worker in these situations. No spotter was used. Further, State highway needs to be notified ahead of time before contractors begin work. They can often lend support. In this instance, they were not called. In addition, to aid drivers, and workers, the rules state the shoulder should be marked off with a tapered line of orange cones blocking off the crew's vehicle, along with a sign warning of shoulder work. Neither was done in this case.


In appears that the State Highway Administration rules for traffic work are routinely broken. As a result, serious accidents occur. If you are involved in any accident and believe it occurred due to the negligence of a highway worker call a Maryland accident attorney at Portner & Shure for a free consultation.



Monday, February 7, 2011

Maryland Pedestrians Beware

Why is it that many times the columns in the newspaper that we read the most are written by authors who we like the least? When it comes to the Ravens I can't stand Mike Preston but I always read his column. Another columnist who continuously rubs me the wrong way is Michael Dresser but, once again, I read his column more than just about any other in the Baltimore Sun. He covers issues ranging from DUI law to bicyclists. His last column claimed that Maryland was one of the most dangerous states for pedestrians. I think I agree with Mr. Dresser.



How could I not agree with him there is empirical evidence in support of his position. The Governors Highway Safety Association recently released a report showing that Maryland is one of only four states where more than twenty percent of all road fatalities involve a pedestrian. Maryland is also one of only four where the pedestrian fatality rate is more than 2 per 100,000 residents each year. There have been between 91 and 116 pedestrian deaths each year since 1991. Some blame the high numbers on the compact nature of Baltimore City others blame drivers' attitudes toward pedestrians. In other states drivers slow down when a pedestrian enters a crosswalk, as opposed to Baltimore where it seems more likely that a motorist would hit the gas.


A ticket for a motorist who fails to yield to a pedestrian in a crosswalk carries a $90 fine. In a world where a round of drinks or a nice bottle of wine can quickly approach $100, wouldn't a higher fine be more appropriate considering the possible consequences? After all, the fine for passing a school bus with flashing red lights is $570. The two offenses seem similar but their fines do not reflect the same. New York recently adopted the "Ellie's Law" statute. The statute was named after a three year old girl who, while in a crosswalk, was struck and left in a coma by a motorists in an SUV reversing to claim a parking spot. The law automatically suspends the license of any driver who strikes a pedestrian while driving recklessly. Maryland laws do not go so far, however, aggressive litigation against the motorists on behalf of the injured will discourage motorists' indifference towards pedestrians and at the same time help recover damages for any treatment and pain and suffering. Portner & Shure handles many cases involving pedestrians each year and refuses to accept negligent driver's excuses or claims of contributory negligence.


Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Anne Arundel County Accident Injures 3 and Driver Dies

A family was resting on a bench from a bicycle ride on Sunday, August 8, 2010, when a car crashed into them near Russett Green West and Ridgemoor Drive in Laurel, Maryland in Anne Arundel County. The couple was sitting on the bench with their two twin boys when a car struck a light pole and then continued on to strike the bench where they were sitting.

The operator of the vehicle, 63 year old, Ms. Ramota Oluyemisi Koletowo was rushed to the hospital where she later died.  The 36 year old man was flown to Shock Trauma and his 38 year old wife was transported to Johns Hopkins Hospital and their 4 year old son was rushed to Johns Hopkins Pediatric with head injuries.  Their second child was not injured. Police are still investigating the crash to determine whether it was fatigue or a medical emergency that contributed to the fatal car accident as Ms. Koletowo was on her way home from working an overnight shift.



The family injured in this accident is entitled to certain benefits from the driver's insurance company, that will cover some of their medical expenses and/or lost wage claim, resulting from  this accident.  These benefits are known as Personal Injury Protection benefits.  They would also be entitled to make a claim for bodily injuries in addition to pain and suffering against the deceased driver.   However, it would need to be determined if the driver was experiencing a medical emergency and whether the driver had prior knowledge of this medical condition that could put them or others at risk.  It is important in these types of accident, that you obtain the help of an experienced  Maryland personal injury lawyer who has handled "sudden emergency defenses."        

If you, a family member or someone you know has been involved in a car accident or you need more information on car accidents or sudden emergency defenses, please contact Portner & Shure for a free consultation with one of our Maryland  personal injury lawyers.

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Fatal Pedestrian Accident in Carroll County

In early May, a Finksburg, Maryland woman was killed when she was struck by a vehicle on Bethel Road in Carrol County. The woman was said to have been chasing after her dog who had run into the street. She was pronounced dead at the scene. The driver of the vehicle has not been charged with an offense.


In this unfortunate situation, the key inquiry is whether or not the pedestrian was inside or out of a crosswalk. As a general rule, pedestrians have the right of way when they are in a crosswalk. However, in the event that a person is crossing a street outside of a crosswalk that person has an obligation to use the greatest care to protect themselves from injury.


If you or someone you know has been injured as the result of a pedestrian related car accident and would like a free legal consultation, please contact Portner & Shure. Maryland accident lawyers are here to answer any questions that you may have.



Alcohol Is a Contributing Factor in Fatal Pedestrian Accident

Earlier this month, the driver of a GMC Sierra struck and killed a man who was attempted to cross Ridge Road in Pasadena, Maryland during the evening hours. The pedestrian was wearing dark clothing and was not in a crosswalk. The Anne Arundel County Police responded. The pedestrian was taken to Baltimore Washington Medical Center where he was pronounced dead a short time later. The police found evidence that suggested that the pedestrian may have been under the influence at the time of the accident.


There is an abundance of laws in Maryland that address situations involving pedestrians that are injured by an automobile. The key inquiry is such accidents are whether or not the pedestrian was inside or out of a crosswalk. As a general rule, pedestrians have the right of way when they are in a crosswalk. However, in the event that a person is crossing a street outside of a crosswalk that person has an obligation to use the greatest care to protect themselves from injury.


In this matter, the family of the deceased may not have a valid claim against the driver of the vehicle. The pedestrian was possibly intoxicated, crossing outside of the crosswalk and was wearing dark clothing at night.


If you or someone you know has been involved in a pedestrian related car accident or if you would like more information on automobile collisions, please contact Portner & Shure. Our Maryland accident lawyers are available to provide you with a free legal consultation.



Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Pedestrian Killed: When Is a Pedestrian at Fault for an Accident?

At the beginning of the month a woman was killed while crossing Bel Air Road in Baltimore County, Maryland. The Baltimore County Police Department spokesperson indicated that the woman appeared to have been trying to outrun the vehicle to get to the other side of the road when she was struck. The woman was taken to Maryland Shock Trauma where she was pronounced dead. The driver of the vehicle immediately stopped and notified police of the accident.


An accident reconstructionist could help the investigating officers determine what happened. Weather conditions, speed of the vehicle, time of day (i.e. was it dark, lighting?), physical evidence such as skid marks are taken into consideration when an accident is being investigated. An accident reconstructionist should be called in fatal or serious motor vehicle and pedestrian accidents.


There is an abundance of laws in Maryland that address situations involving pedestrians that are injured by an automobile. The key inquiry in such accidents is whether or not the pedestrian was inside or out of a crosswalk. As a general rule, pedestrians have the right of way when they are in a crosswalk. However, in the event that a person is crossing a street outside of a crosswalk that person has an obligation to use the greatest care to protect themselves from injury.


If you, a family member, or someone you know has been involved in a pedestrian related car accident, or if you would like more information on automobile accidents, please contact Portner & Shure for a free consultation. Our Maryland Accident Lawyers are available to provide you with a free legal consultation.



Fatal Pedestrian Accident

On Monday, April 26, 2010, there was a fatal accident on Interstate 95 in Cecil County, Maryland. The Maryland State Police said they believe that the victim, Lamar Stanford, was driving his car on Interstate 95 when he struck a guardrail. Police said that they believe Mr. Stanford exited his vehicle and attempted to cross Interstate 95 on foot when he was struck by another vehicle traveling northbound. He was pronounced dead at the scene. The driver of the vehicle who struck him suffered bodily injuries and was taken to Union Memorial Hospital.


The police further noted that they do not believe that there are any contributing factors from the driver of the vehicle who struck Stanford. Contributing factors such as speed or alcohol do not appear to be an issue here.


The key inquiry in any pedestrian related accidents is whether or not the pedestrian was inside or out of a crosswalk. As a general rule, pedestrians have the right of way when they are in a crosswalk. However, in the event that a person is crossing a street, outside of a crosswalk, that person has an obligation to use the greatest care to protect themselves from injury.


Minor accidents often turn into serious when people leave their vehicles after the impact and walk on, or stay too close to the roadway. Respect the fact that drivers often are not paying attention. This fact leads to fender benders. It can lead to death if you are a person walking on or near a roadway.


If you, a family member, or someone you know has been injured as the result of a pedestrian related accident, or if you would like more information on automobile collisions, please contact Portner & Shure for a free legal consultation. Our Maryland personal injury lawyers are available to assist you.



Friday, May 14, 2010

Pedestrian Killed Crossing Route 40 in Harford County

The Aberdeen Police crash team is investigating an accident that occurred Friday, April 2, 2010.  Michael R. Patton, 49, of Aberdeen was struck and killed by a man from Edgewood operating a 2002 International truck in the eastbound lanes of Pulaski Highway near Carol Avenue, in Harford County.  The identity of the man operating the truck has not yet been released and a spokesperson for the police department indicated they are not sure if charges will be filed.

The accident occurred in a fairly dark location of the roadway.  The crash team when investigating these types of accident has to look at environmental issues, lighting and those types of things that could make it safer for pedestrians.   Pedestrians should also use crosswalks, whenever possible and look both ways before crossing a highway.  

Regardless, of whether it was pedestrian error or the driver's fault that the accident occurred, the pedestrian is entitled to benefits from that driver's policy.  Specifically, his family would be entitled to Personal Injury Protection benefits to cover funeral expenses up to the limit of coverage available under that driver's policy.  In the event the pedestrian also owned a motor vehicle and carried Personal Injury Protection benefits in excess of the driver who struck him, than his family could also look to his policy to cover additional expenses. The family of the deceased may also bring a wrongful death claim.  

If you, a family member, or someone you know has been injured in a pedestrian accident or any other type of automobile accident or you need more information on automobile accidents and Personal Injury Protection benefits, please contact Portner & Shure and speak with one of our Maryland accident lawyers for a free consultation.


Monday, April 19, 2010

Pedestrian dies in Montgomery County Automobile Accident

On April 2, 2010, at approximately 5:54 p.m., Shu Bing Huang had just exited a bus at Veirs Mill Road and Randolph Road when she was struck by a motorist who jumped the curb striking her and then proceeded on to strike another vehicle.  Ms. Huang was pronounced dead at the scene.  The driver of the vehicle, 79 year old Thomas McCargo Rankin is alleging he does not know what caused him to lose control of his vehicle.  The Huang family has retained the law firm of Portner & Shure.  

An accident reconstruction is currently being conducted which can take anywhere between 6 to 8 weeks to complete.  The reconstruction unit will determine the approximate impact speed and the possible causes of this tragic automobile accident.  

In some states once a person reaches a certain age they are required to take their driver's test again to ensure they are still capable of operating a motor vehicle in a safe manner so as not to endanger the life of another individual.  This should be a law in all states to ensure the safety of other pedestrians and motorists on the highways.  Some other states have even gone further and once an individual reaches 80 years of age they are no longer permitted to drive.  

If you, a family member or someone you know has been involved in an automobile accident or you would like more information on automobile accidents, pedestrian accidents or medical emergency defenses, please contact Portner & Shure for a free consultation.  

Monday, April 5, 2010

Driver Intentionally Hits Four People With Car

In early March, the driver of a vehicle intentionally hit four people in Chillum, Maryland with his vehicle. Two of the victims sustained injuries after being struck on University Parkway. The Prince George's County Police are unsure of the reason behind this assault but indicated that this appeared to be a domestic matter. Although the driver was taken into custody after the assault, the details of the charges pending against him were not made available.


An intentional tort is defined as "a tort in which the actor is expressly or impliedly judged to have possessed intent or purpose to injure." This situation is a perfect example of an intentional tort. If the driver willingly got behind the wheel of a car and struck a crowd of people in an effort to hurt or injure anyone then his actions can be classified as an intentional tort.


Assuming the automobile insurance carrier covers this intentional act, the injured individuals in this situation could pursue a claim for bodily injuries against the driver of the vehicle.. The drivers' insurance carrier could be responsible for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering or even mental distress. Problems may still occur with the amount of automobile coverage available since at least two people were hurt. In cases were multiple people are injured a Maryland automobile accident attorney must quickly determine all possible personal injury coverages.


If you, a family member, or someone you know was injured in a car accident or if you would like more information on automobile accident, please contact Portner & Shure for a free consultation.



Monday, March 8, 2010

Husband and Wife Mishap Turns Tragic in Harford County

A tractor trailer kills a D.C man and seriously injured his wife in an accident on I-95 north of Mountain Road in Harford County on Wednesday, February 24, 2010. Leonard Clark and his wife, Kimberly Clark were operating separate vehicles, a Dodge Charger and Dodge Durango when they collided with each other. The couple then exited their respective vehicles and were standing in the roadway when a tractor trailer driver attempted to stop, but jack-knifed and struck both of them. Mr. Clark was pronounced dead at the scene and his wife was transported to Maryland Shock Trauma in critical condition.


I-95 was closed for several hours while Maryland State Police conducted their investigation, which is still ongoing. No charges have been made as the Maryland State Police reports it's too early in the investigation.


Tractor trailer accidents are considered to be one of the most catastrophic accidents due to their weight and size. Typically anyone that is struck by a tractor trailer is at risk for sustaining serious bodily injuries or dying. Additionally, accidents commonly involve cars or pedestrians who are on the side of the road. My advice is to not discuss anything on the immediate side of the road, get as far away from the highway as possible.


If you, a family member or someone you know has been involved in a truck accident or if you need more information on these types of accidents, please contact Portner & Shure for a free consultation.



Friday, February 19, 2010

Howard County Pedestrian Accident

There is an abundance of laws in Maryland that address situations involving pedestrians that are injured by an automobile while crossing a street. The key inquiry is such accidents are whether or not the pedestrian was inside or out of a crosswalk. As a general rule, pedestrians have the right of way when they are in a crosswalk. However, in the event that a person is crossing a street outside of a crosswalk that person has an obligation to use the greatest care to protect themselves from injury.


Earlier this year an eighteen-year-old man from Columbia, Maryland was attempting to cross Little Patuxent Parkway between Vantage Point Road and Columbia Road when he was truck by an oncoming car. The police said that the young man was wearing dark clothes and was not in a cross walk when he was struck. He was transported to University of Maryland Shock Trauma where he presented with serious injuries.


If you, a family member, or someone you know has been injured as the result of being a pedestrian or if you would like more information on car accidents please contact Portner & Shure for a free consultation.